the intention of publishing the feedback below is so that all students can benefit by understanding the strengths and weakness’ of a range of projects. Please take the time to review other students work with these comments in mind. If you have any questions or would like any further clarification don’t hesitate to ask me during the studio session.
Khiem Nguyen
Key strength of the scheme: Consistency of forms and relation to the words chosen
Most significant weakness of the scheme: use of textures, too many
Zumeng Zhang
Xiaojing lu
Key strength of the scheme: limited choice of materials
Most significant weakness of the scheme: the lack of order in the use of the materials
Xi Zhang
extension granted due to illness
Peilli Ye
Key strength of the scheme: composition of the underground and floating form above
Most significant weakness of the scheme: glass box to the left of the floating object destroys the notion of the object truly floating.
Sisi Wang
Key strength of the scheme: consistent theme, composition, animations with music
Most significant weakness of the scheme: not quite a complete harmonious piece of architecture, very close though. Keep up the good work
Key strength of the scheme: spiral stair
Most significant weakness of the scheme: the final architecture, dislocated and uninteresting
Tanya Shumsky
Key strength of the scheme: use of repetition, the thick screen, should have been on both sides
Most significant weakness of the scheme: lack of coming to terms with the underground space, it is carved out of a mass, yours makes the ground look like it is a floor that is floating
Reginald Santos
Key strength of the scheme: is step up from an ordinary building
Most significant weakness of the scheme: is an ordinary piece of architecture, lack of effort, you need to try much harder, have a look at the other students work
Hong Qui
Key strength of the scheme: the stairs, overall composition
Most significant weakness of the scheme: use of textures and the understanding of carved out space in the underground
James Metcalfe
Key strength of the scheme: architectural expression of power, effort placed into the final sketchup model , use of texture, overall well done
Most significant weakness of the scheme: the floating timber platform should seem more floating, the inability to feel in tension in the underground spaces
Julia Luechtefeld
Key strength of the scheme: good development of a very good section. Tried hard to find the tension needed
Most significant weakness of the scheme: use of texture, didn’t exaggerate enough the idea of the building floating above the datum / ground
Alan Leones
Key strength of the scheme: just did what was required
Most significant weakness of the scheme: failure to improve on the section, should be abridge between the objects and the objects could hide the spaces. A very ordinary piece of architecture with no surprise mystery or adventure
Key strength of the scheme: underground studio is a dynamic space
Most significant weakness of the scheme: above ground space is a decorated box and lacks tension and excitement and exaggeration that should be in a good piece of architectureSeung Jin Jeon
Key strength of the scheme: sticking to the repetition of the forms
Most significant weakness of the scheme: the understanding of the datum the building above the ground should allow for the gallery beneath it. Not finished with animations
Angus Hardwick
Key strength of the scheme: the dramatic underground and the stair down to this space, the overall tension between the two worlds great use of textures
Most significant weakness of the scheme: need to render the ground as solid. Or at least give the underground dome a good sized wall thickness
Key strength of the scheme: the underground maze fits the word grow exceptionally well
Most significant weakness of the scheme: the above ground studio is an ordinary building, there is no mystery or excitement, the form also contradicts itself, if curved and organic then be so to an extreme
Zhen Chin
Key strength of the scheme: the ramp like stair and the floating doughnut
Most significant weakness of the scheme: the doughnut is truncated at the bottom limiting the effects of floating and the use of texture is random. The underground has no reason to its form
Richard Carter
Key strength of the scheme: some good sections, the linkage of spaces
Most significant weakness of the scheme: too many spaces, not enough thought into the words and light entering the spaces, try to make it more simple but more extreme, walls have thicknesses
Key strength of the scheme: great interpretation of the underground space
Most significant weakness of the scheme: the above ground studio needs more work, the pipes should be coming up from the water like the Fiona hall piece. Some good work where are your textures?
Divya Abraham
Key strength of the scheme: the below ground studio is an excellent space, the above ground composition is good from a distance
Most significant weakness of the scheme: the above ground needs more work, more of the spikes, closer together to walk over a new landscape would help to create a more powerful piece of architecture, keep trying
All the best with experiment 2
i just wonder that i got a comment for first assignment. Do you know that I was sick so i have got some times to do. My submission day is 21st of April at 1:30. Why is there my comment?
ReplyDelete